Mon Nov 20, 2017 8:05 pm
I've often wondered if the availability and popularity of the Realist and Kodak 3D still cameras for home use helped technicians working in Hollywood prepare for their work on 3D features in the early 50s. In the 90s, I did quite a bit of 3D still photography and it was helpful to understand what kind of lighting and compositions worked well (and no so well) for good 3D effects.
Several of the 50s era films I've seen in 3D seem to be more planned for the format - many of the current batch of 3D movies from the past decade seem to be framed and thought out for 2D with the 3D an afterthought.
Any idea how many of the people that worked on the 3D classics of the 50s experimented with Realist and Kodak 3D still cameras before they started work on a 3D feature?