| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ferdinand Von Galitzien

Joined: 25 Dec 2007 Posts: 175
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:09 am Post subject: "Desert Nights" (1929) By William Nigh |
|
|
Herr Hugh Rand is the manager of an important African diamond mine and
is waiting for a visit, more precisely, from Lord Stonehill and his
daughter Diana; since he hasn't seen a white woman for years in such a
desolate place, Herr Rand thinks that Herr Lord Stonehill's daughter
won't be a beauty but an old maid, bow-legged and cross-eyed; but he is
wrong, because she turns out to be a gorgeous lady and shocked by this
unexpected surprise, Herr Rand tries to seduce her; but, as always
happens with people in love, Herr Rand's love idiocy prevents him from
seeing that this beauty is also a crook and the partner of her supposed
father, another crook, natürlich!, who pretty soon kidnaps Herr Rand
after robbing a tray of diamonds.
"Desert Nights" is an anodyne film production, directed by the anodyne
Herr William Nigh, that uses many clichés of the adventure film ( Herr
Nigh likes especially exotic film productions ); besides the film had a
poor story. The film has little interest and the most remarkable aspect
of this oeuvre is that it starred the important silent actor Herr John
Gilbert in what was his last silent film and the beginning of his
unsuccessful talkie career, decadence with a tragic ending.
So, it is not strange that this German count hasn't enjoyed this film,
because the Calahari desert is not Monte Carlo; not to mention that
this Teutonic aristocrat prefers racehorses instead of those vultures
and hyenas that can be seen in the film ( besides, these last ones have
been part of the family for centuries... ), and doesn't understand the
main characters of the film yearning for water when they are lost in
the desert, instead of simply asking for a cocktail; not to mention the
sweaty rags they wear in such a hot place instead of an impeccable and
elegant Prussian uniform... In spite of all, there is something in
common between those crooks and German aristocrats, their interest in
diamonds; don't forget too that Herr Gilbert was an attractive seducer,
the same as this German count…
And now, if you'll allow me, I must temporarily take my leave because
this German Count must enjoy a dessert.
Herr Graf Ferdinand Von Galitzien
http://ferdinandvongalitzien.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Gagman 66

Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 1243
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 1:45 am Post subject: Counter-Point |
|
|
Ferdinand Von Galitzien,
Yikes! I couldn't disagree more. Have no idea why you didn't like this movie? Personally, I thought DESERT NIGHTS was surprisingly good for John Gilbert's final Silent film. All three of the leads Gilbert, Mary Nolan, and Ernest Torrence are in top form from what I can see. The characters are established quickly, and allot happens in a short period of time. So you have good, concise story-telling.
Sure the film is missing about a reel, with several obvious jump-cuts here and there, but what survives of this picture is quite well done. And the vintage scoring track in just wonderful. As pure entertainment, DESERT NIGHTS is a highly enjoyable movie, well worth seeing. Gilbert and the gorgeous Nolan had smouldering on-screen chemistry, and it's a shame that they didn't work together again. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
FrankFay

Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 726 Location: albany NY
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:37 pm Post subject: Re: Counter-Point |
|
|
| Gagman 66 wrote: |
Ferdinand Von Galitzien,
Yikes! I couldn't disagree more. Have no idea why you didn't like this movie? Personally, I thought DESERT NIGHTS was surprisingly good for John Gilbert's final Silent film. All three of the leads Gilbert, Mary Nolan, and Ernest Torrence are in top form from what I can see. The characters are established quickly, and allot happens in a short period of time. So you have good, concise story-telling.
Sure the film is missing about a reel, with several obvious jump-cuts here and there, but what survives of this picture is quite well done. And the vintage scoring track in just wonderful. As pure entertainment, DESERT NIGHTS is a highly enjoyable movie, well worth seeing. Gilbert and the gorgeous Nolan had smouldering on-screen chemistry, and it's a shame that they didn't work together again. |
I agree! It's a neat piece of entertainment- not an outstanding classic but fun to watch. Everyone is not only in top form but they seem to be enjoying it- especially Torrence.
Now- I haven't seen it for a while, but isn't this where Gilbert refers to Bryan as a "Bimbo"? _________________ Eric Stott |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
greta de groat

Joined: 20 Jan 2008 Posts: 582 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have to agree with the Count here, i found the film shockingly poor, with barely any story and extremely contrived ending. The performers were all fine and very professional, but it sure looked like the studio didn't care what it threw Gilbert into . At least The Cossacks was an honest misfire, but this just looked like a programmer with a surface gloss trying to cover up the fact that there wasn't enough plot for a 2 reeler.
The thing that struck me about the film, though, was that the 2 films i've seen Mary Nolan in, she gets dragged around and roughed up quite a bit. I'm wondering if her personal reputation made the studio more willing to cast her in that kind of part. And maybe not cast her in parts that would have done her career some good.
greta _________________ Greta de Groat
Unsung Divas of the Silent Screen
http://www.stanford.edu/~gdegroat |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
James Bazen
Joined: 19 Dec 2007 Posts: 255 Location: Canton, Ohio
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| greta de groat wrote: |
I have to agree with the Count here, i found the film shockingly poor, with barely any story and extremely contrived ending. The performers were all fine and very professional, but it sure looked like the studio didn't care what it threw Gilbert into . At least The Cossacks was an honest misfire, but this just looked like a programmer with a surface gloss trying to cover up the fact that there wasn't enough plot for a 2 reeler.
The thing that struck me about the film, though, was that the 2 films i've seen Mary Nolan in, she gets dragged around and roughed up quite a bit. I'm wondering if her personal reputation made the studio more willing to cast her in that kind of part. And maybe not cast her in parts that would have done her career some good.
greta |
Oh, I have to agree with Eric and Gagman. I found this an expertly made picture with the cast in fine form. Gilbert and Nolan did have great chemistry onscreen. For me, it was a well spent hour or so at home. _________________ James
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1342382127&ref=profile |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Ferdinand Von Galitzien

Joined: 25 Dec 2007 Posts: 175
|
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| greta de groat wrote: |
I have to agree with the Count here
greta |
Danke Schön, mein liebe Dame Grreta for your silent support...
Talking about "Desert Nights", it is not a bad film but it is not a good film either... that is to say, it is a small and predictable production, nothing new under the silent sun, certainly unless you are not very demanding...
Probably some youngsters longhaired will enjoy this movie ( this Herr Graf enjoyed this oeuvre moderately ) but as this Herr Von said before, the plot is so obvious and predictable that you can't expect nothing special, overall if you have seen other Herr Gilbert adventure films; it is an anodyne, harmless and even transitional silent film production that put a simple end to Herr Gilbert great silent career in where, this Herr Von believes, you can find a lot more interesting entertainment films than this one.
Herr Graf Ferdinand Von Galitzien
http://ferdinandvongalitzien.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Christopher Jacobs Moderator

Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 253 Location: Grand Forks, North Dakota
|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess I agree closest to Eric on Desert Nights. While predictable and perhaps a bit disappointing, it is a prime example of solid studio product that is well-made, entertaining, and features a top-notch cast. There may be any number of silent features that are much better, but not too many were still being made in 1929 when everybody else was jumping into talkie production with little or no ability to make dialogue pictures that were also cinematic. Much as I enjoy transitional talkies and part-talkies for their struggles with the new technology (as well as recording my favorite era of pop music), films like Desert Nights are a welcome and rare example of what could still be done visually while others preferred the novelty value of synchronized but stilted dialogue, numerous loud sound effects, and photographed stage routines.
--Christopher Jacobs
http://www.und.edu/instruct/cjacobs |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
|
|